Compare ark data centers

Digital Realty vs ark data centers: Which Data Center Platform Delivers Better ROI?

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and reliability to find the best data center & colocation solution.

Comprehensive comparison of Digital Realty vs ark data centers Data Center platforms, with expert guidance from SmashByte's deployment team.

Why Compare Digital Realty vs ark data centers?

Both Digital Realty and ark data centers are established players in the data center & colocation market, but they take fundamentally different approaches to features, pricing, and support. This comparison helps you understand which platform aligns better with your specific requirements, existing infrastructure, and growth trajectory.

Key Differences at a Glance

  • Digital Realty: Known for cabinets maxed out with 18-month wait for more space, but offers strong low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp
  • ark data centers: Focuses on scalable power up to 30kw per cabinet with emphasis on carrier-neutral mmr with 100+ networks

Feature Comparison

When evaluating Data Center platforms, the features that matter most depend on your use case. Digital Realty excels in certain scenarios—particularly for teams that prioritize low-latency peering to aws, azure, and gcp—while ark data centers shines for organizations that need scalable power up to 30kw per cabinet.

Pricing & Total Cost of Ownership

List price rarely tells the full story. Digital Realty and ark data centers have different pricing structures, volume discount thresholds, and hidden costs. SmashByte helps you calculate true 3-year TCO including implementation, training, and ongoing support.

SmashByte's Assessment

We've deployed both platforms across industries including healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The "right" choice depends on factors like existing infrastructure, in-house technical expertise, compliance requirements, and growth plans.

Schedule a free consultation with SmashByte to get a customized comparison based on your specific environment. We'll provide pricing benchmarks, reference architectures, and implementation timelines for both options.

Issues Others Are Having

Cabinets maxed out with 18-month wait for more space

Creates operational bottlenecks and increases total cost of ownership.

Fix

SmashByte helps you evaluate which platform better addresses this through proof-of-concept testing.

Power density limited to 5kW per cabinet

Impacts deployment timeline and ongoing management complexity.

Fix

We provide implementation best practices and cost optimization strategies for both platforms.

Recommended Architecture

For most enterprises, we recommend a phased evaluation approach: start with a 30-day pilot of Digital Realty or ark data centers in a single department or location, establish clear success metrics, then scale based on results. SmashByte can help you design a proof-of-concept that minimizes risk while providing data-driven decision criteria.

Solutions by Need

See all →

Playbook

Need Carrier-neutral MMR with 100+ networks? ark data centers vs Alternatives

Organizations struggle with decommissioning 200+ legacy servers safely, making carrier-neutral mmr with 100+ networks a critical requirement.

View need page

Playbook

Need Low-latency peering to AWS, Azure, and GCP? ark data centers vs Alternatives

Low-latency peering to AWS, Azure, and GCP isn't optional—it's essential for modern data center & colocation deployments. But not all platforms deliver it equally.

View need page

Playbook

Need Scalable power up to 30kW per cabinet? ark data centers vs Alternatives

Scalable power up to 30kW per cabinet isn't optional—it's essential for modern data center & colocation deployments. But not all platforms deliver it equally.

View need page