SmashByte's unbiased analysis of Masergy and Cato Networks based on 100+ enterprise deployments.
Why Compare Masergy vs Cato Networks?
Both Masergy and Cato Networks are established players in the sd-wan & network security market, but they take fundamentally different approaches to features, pricing, and support. This comparison helps you understand which platform aligns better with your specific requirements, existing infrastructure, and growth trajectory.
Key Differences at a Glance
- Masergy: Known for initial sd-wan deployment took 8 months, but offers strong application-aware routing with deep packet inspection
- Cato Networks: Focuses on zero-touch provisioning with ship-to-site with emphasis on built-in wan optimization and deduplication
Feature Comparison
When evaluating SD-WAN platforms, the features that matter most depend on your use case. Masergy excels in certain scenarios—particularly for teams that prioritize application-aware routing with deep packet inspection—while Cato Networks shines for organizations that need zero-touch provisioning with ship-to-site.
Pricing & Total Cost of Ownership
List price rarely tells the full story. Masergy and Cato Networks have different pricing structures, volume discount thresholds, and hidden costs. SmashByte helps you calculate true 3-year TCO including implementation, training, and ongoing support.
SmashByte's Assessment
We've deployed both platforms across industries including healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The "right" choice depends on factors like existing infrastructure, in-house technical expertise, compliance requirements, and growth plans.
Schedule a free consultation with SmashByte to get a customized comparison based on your specific environment. We'll provide pricing benchmarks, reference architectures, and implementation timelines for both options.